A Project to Take Root

Sitting on a plane is ample time for thinking. Cramped in a small space, lights dim, faint snoring behind you, the only real noises are your thoughts – and of course the occasional Arcade Fire song. It got me thinking about the corporate leaders, business owners, diplomats, investors around me, which led me to wonder: where are our mentality ill friends?

That’s when I realized, out of the four years I have lived here, I have seen not twenty, not ten, but two mentally ill people in China. TWO. In my public school in California, there were at least four attending the school and they were a vital part of our education and community. I see their posts on Facebook, selfies, pictures of them participating in pep rallies and football games. This is where dichotomy exists, in China, they are not given the chance to coexist and thrive in society. The fact of the matter is, mentally ill people are warded off into undeveloped suburbs, compounds, or even hospitals. Attached are stigmas and even worse, the government turns a blind eye to their rights, health, and living conditions.

According to a 2012 study in the journal Lancet, China has 173 million people with some sort of diagnosable mental disorder and of those, 158 million have never received any treatment. Where are all these people?

  • China is extremely ill-equipped to provide the health care needed, China averages one psychiatrist for every 83,000 people.

These statistics display a stark truth and propose a question:

The truth: The nation requires a 180 degree change in their course of action: the first step being to stop ignoring this population of people.

The question: What came first, the ill-equipped care or the stigmatization?

Did the stigmatization create just cause to ignore this huge population of people and neglect their needs or did the lack of adequate care cause negative generalizations?  

HOWEVER, this is not a hopeless cause.

  • Awareness of autism in China has grown in recent years, fueled by parental advocates and autism organizations.

According to the Wall Street Journal:

China also is carrying out its first two large-scale prevalence studies. One is an eight-city, 120,000-child undertaking expected to be completed this year, says Yi Wang, director of the department of neurology at the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, who is involved in the project. The other an 11-city, 200,000-child study through a collaboration including Cambridge University, the China Disabled Persons’ Federation, Peking University and the National Institute of Biological Sciences, says Liping Wei, a prominent autism researcher involved in that study.

Clearly, China is still in its preliminary stages in terms of adequately dealing with mental illness. China only has begun its research, however, this does provide that through legitimate organizations they are attempting to gain understanding and insight on illnesses. However, the progress will be undeniably painstakingly slow, and the hundreds of million mentally ill are still suffering, are being denied of their rights, and are not given the opportunity to exist alongside others in society.

No one in China has mentally ill friends, coworkers, rarely have people seen them enter stores or restaurants. When they do, however, the Chinese are scared. They are unaware of who these people are, they are unaware of how to understand them or to view them as equals.

THE PROJECT

  1. Together with the Mental Health Awareness club leader at my school, we will be researching mental illness in China including:
  • Institutions
    • Hospitals
    • Homes
    • Schools
  • Treatment
  • Stigmas
  • Laws/Policies

2. Upon doing so, I will be conducting interviews in public areas in Beijing about the attitudes and awareness in Beijing, asking a series of questions to assimilate understanding regarding how the general public is exposed to mental illness and compile them into a documentary.

3. We will create a Sina blog (hopefully we won’t be censored), broadcast the video around our school, attempt to spread it throughout the local community

  • I’m also thinking of printing flyers that point to the blog, distributing them and potentially build a following

4. Next, we will visit institutions, facilities, including hospitals, homes, and schools, gather further understanding and create a second documentary for the blog

5. As of now, the last video will aim to educate people on mental illness, how to accept them in society, etc.

Of course this will be an overarching and difficult process that will interfere with schoolwork and being a teenager, but this is a minority that is being overlooked and is thus suffering.

As someone who notices the absence of mentally ill individuals in society, I cannot simply be a bystander.

Experience: Being censored in China

I decided to create a blog on sina.cn in order to access an audience within the firewall, as the Chinese population cannot access WordPress blogs. As I attempted to create a post about censorship and its true nature, I was censored!

Screen Shot 2015-10-29 at 7.02.39 PM

Translation: Your content contains illegal words.

This might be as a result of using the word “censor” or “censorship” 15 times. This was interesting to me, since I referred to the measures used by internet content providers in my post and I experienced firsthand how quickly this occurred. I tried to alter the body of my text and I removed the Chinese text that pertained to censorship, but to no ends. I found no solution.

I guess I’ll publish here!


The True Nature of Chinese Censorship

Introduction:

Censorship in China is inherently embedded in the society, to the point where a large portion of the population is willing to accept the news thrown at them because they simply do not know better. Of course, censorship is the means to these ends, where the government is in control of the information released to the public. However, what is the true nature of censorship? Is Chinese censorship aimed to restrict state criticism and expression?

How does China censor so effectively?​

China monitors the population through internet service providers. While social networking sites, blog sites, etc. are owned by private companies, internet content providers are responsible for complying to standards set by the government. These internet content providers may hire around 1,000 workers to ensure compliance to the rules set in place by the government.

What is the nature of censorship?

The popular belief is that censorship occurs in order to maintain an image for the Chinese government. This is true, to an extent. For example, a popular TV host named Bi Fujian (毕福剑) criticized Mao Ze Dong(毛泽东)and was suspended. This reaction is not seen in other countries, for example, in the U.S., humor towards Barack Obama is a common occurrence. However, a renowned TV host criticizing Mao seems unprecedented. However, the true nature of Chinese censorship is to prevent a mass uprising against the government.

In reality, someone criticizing the government is not more ​likely to be censored or punished. Chinese censorship is most prevalent in tense situations, where the government restricts social network communication in attempts to prevent groups of people from uprising. For example, during the Hong Kong riots, the Chinese government blocked Instagram in Mainland China in order to prevent Chinese citizens from accessing the ideologies of the rioters.

How can we determine the true nature of censorship?​

In order to underpin the goal or intention behind censorship, statistics released by the government would  have to be distinguished from their true values. However, this is impossible as it would be nonsensical for the government to release true statistics when trying to hinder the public from accessing them.

However, using patterns from past instances of censorship can allow a more thorough understanding of the government’s main intent behind censorship.

Personal Experience: YangTze Cruise: China Censors National Tragedy

Read more about the disaster here: http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/02/asia/china-yangtze-river-ship-sinking/index.html

As per usual, Chinese authorities are working hard to censor from the general masses the true nature of the accident. The cruise, carrying 458 passengers capsized, after catching in a tornado. Rescuers were only able to save 14 passengers, about 3%.26 passengers have been confirmed as dead, and 400 are still missing.

Screen Shot 2015-06-03 at 9.17.39 PM

The disaster is apprehensible but the epidemic is entirely unnecessary. I’ve been interning at Chinese National Radio, and I’ve been moderating and keeping track of the influx of news that is updated on the largest Chinese news websites daily, for the past 3 days – thus, I’ve seen firsthand the lack of sufficient information the government can provide to the citizens. Little information is given. Here is a post from June 3rd on cnr.cn:

“北京时间6月1日晚,载有456人的“东方之星”客轮在长江遭遇极端天气,发生翻沉事故。事故发生后,中国国家主席习近平批示全力做好人员搜救,中国国家总理李克强2日赶至事故现场,当天事故现场聚集了各式船艇,4000多人冒雨搜救。据日本共同社6月3日透露,日本首相安倍晋三3日就“东方之星”翻沉事故致函中国国家主席习近平和国务院总理李克强,表示“日本将提供尽可能的帮助”。(记者王欢)”

Translated (with a few errors):

“  Beijing on the evening of June 1, carrying 456 people of “Oriental Star” ferry in the Yangtze River suffered extreme weather, capsized accident occurred. After the accident, Chinese President Xi Jinping instructions to make every effort to search and rescue personnel, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang on the 2nd rushed to the accident site, the day of the accident scene gathered a variety of boats, more than 4,000 people rain rescue. According to Japan’s Kyodo News June 3 revealed that Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the 3rd on the “Star of the East” capsized accident sent a letter to Chinese President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang, said, “Japan will provide the best possible help.” (Reporter Wang Huan)”

http://military.cnr.cn/gjjs/20150603/t20150603_518737137.html (June 3, 2015 14:59:00)

The information is brief, as well as quite late – seeing as the accident occurred on June 1st and the post is from June 3rd.

The website includes other updates, however none of them address the number of casualties and the number of rescues. Journalists are asked to focus on positive aspects of the accident, like successful rescues. Journalists have been thwarted from entering the premise.

Wall Street Journal compares the coverage: 

The government has placed strict regulations on the journalism, blocking off all journalists from speaking to the relatives of the passengers. 

The information is kept in firm hands. Controversy surrounds the true nature of the accident, some believe the ship sunk upon hitting the tornado. The Changjiang Maritime Safety Agency, responsible for releasing information about weather to ships has not answered any questions from the press.

The censorship following a national tragedy parallels other previous incidents, such as the Shanghai stampede on New Year’s, 2015.

Documentary About Beijing Locals

This is slightly relevant and slightly irrelevant. Here is a documentary type film I made as a project for school. Essentially I interviewed a couple of locals about what makes life in Beijing difficult, and interestingly enough – none of them were from Beijing. They were all migrants from other places in China, so whether or not they truly are locals depends on if you’re an expat or not. Also quite interesting was the fact that many people were fearful of being on film to talk about life in Beijing, even if it was for a teenager’s school project. There isn’t a lot of specific and groundbreaking information, but this was eye opening to me in terms of the effect of oppression and censorship on the locals as I was creating the documentary.

Check it out, it’s only 4 minutes long!

** Apologies for the quality, it suffers a little on youtube for some reason.

APEC in Beijing

2014: Beijing is hosting the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation. In order to ensure a successful venture, China has gone to measures to ensure clean air quality, traffic control, and has even required public schools, state-operated businesses to close down. There has also been encouragement for the 20 million citizens of Beijing to leave town.

The month of October was nothing unusual for Beijing. Leaving the house consisted of breathing in lungfuls and lungfuls of smog. Staying indoors consisted of listening to the hum of air filters. Yet due to APEC, and the inconvenience for even international students, “holidays” or days off (of blue skies) have been juxtaposed into our calendars.

Smog and traffic are pretty much the epitome of Beijing, so it really makes no sense as to why they’re thwarting the lives of all 20 million citizens to seem like a halfway decent city to the APEC conference and the media it’ll bring. I guess pollution-less skies can be achieved, as we’ve seen with this conference and the Michelle Obama visit of 2014. But the means of achieving it aren’t so practical. So I guess haze and grey skies it is!

Update: The government has even removed the firewall on the internet in certain areas where the conferences will be held. So in addition to the unpolluted skies and lack of traffic, there will also be no censorship. Who is China trying to fool?

Dear Diary,

cropped-screen-shot-2015-04-26-at-9-36-04-pm.png

I’ve finally been able to make a blog! Making a blog in China is definitely not easy, especially one that acknowledges the world outside of the Great Firewall of China. It’d probably be shut down within days if I used a Chinese blogging platform. Platforms like wordpress and blogspot are actually blocked here. I’ll be making a post about how we bypass the censorship in China soon.
Here’s an equation for you:
An opinionated 15 year old in China + VPN = Teen in the Jing.
I wasn’t always in Beijing. My journey began in 2010, when my parents and I packed up our things in suburbia, California and moved to Beijing, China. The deficit was unreal. Even just among Beijing, the conditions between the developed areas and the lesser developed areas was unexplainable. Adjusting to such a big city was beyond comprehension for an 11 year old. Moving to Beijing was an instant submersion in a wealth of culture. Some things were similar however, as I was sheltered from the big bad real world in the [security] guarded (literally, security guards everywhere) international community, but undeniably there was a lot of new perspectives and new levels of rough conditions right in front of me. There was so much hardship I had never seen before, even in <em>Beijing</em>, which is considered to be on parr with MEDC countries. I had to adjust quickly, though it was pretty hard for an 11 year old not to crumble each time an elderly homeless couple boarded the subway singing, asking for spare change, and facing refusal from 7/10 people.

Eventually, however, you start to build a tolerance. Given any public area, there’s a pretty high chance that you’ll see a woman with a baby strapped to her back, noses red from the cold, or a blind man playing beautiful music on a splintered instrument on the side of the street. This doesn’t mean I’ll ever forget how shocking it felt to see a man who’s arms had both been amputated, or a family huddled together, shivering in the cold.

Beijing has also allowed me to broaden my perspective. My knowledge of current events and awareness/knowledge of other countries in general has expanded significantly. Maybe it was my age, but immediately after the change in environment, it seemed like everything was more interconnected in such a way that it was “the world”, instead of “America and the world”.
Basically, Beijing has been eye opening. Spending the rest of my adolescence in a city like this means the opportunity for daily indulgence in culture, living amongst some of the richest history in China, and actually having awareness for the world around me, and not just America. There was nothing of the sort in suburbia, where probably the biggest issue was the strict law on what time lawns could be watered. But I don’t miss being sheltered, this is a taste of the real world.